Consider, if you will, the Chrysler PT Cruiser. It’s a car you’ll either love or hate. There really is nothing in between. A retro-styled American car, owned and driven by people who should know better.
Or is it?
Ian Seabrook, a chap we like to refer to as PetrolBlog’s Wales-based cousin, is a man of unquestionable taste and the longest beard in motoring journalism. Surely a man with a penchant for cheap motoring and French fancies couldn’t possibly find anything to like in the Chrysler PT Cruiser? His Twitter account would suggest otherwise…
I saw a Chrysler PT Cruiser today and actually thought it looked pretty ace. This has never happened before. Should I be worried?
— Ian Seabrook (@dollywobbler) October 16, 2015
So what are we to make of that? Given that the tweet was sent at 4:52pm, it’s unlikely Ian was drunk at the time. And as he followed it up with a further three Chrysler PT Cruiser related tweets, we can safely assume his account wasn’t hacked. So there’s definitely some love for Chrysler’s much-maligned time machine.
In truth, the Chrysler PT Cruiser creates a problem for PetrolBlog. As a website that champions the obscure, the mundane and the forgotten, PB should be waving the Stars and Stripes for the PT Cruiser, especially given prices start from as little as £500. This is prime Bangerwatch territory.
Remember, PetrolBlog believes that every dog has its day, even the mangiest old mongrel that likes to wipe its bottom on the living room carpet. So where does that leave the Chrysler PT Cruiser?
Ian’s tweet was timely, because for some time PB has been considering a feature on unlovable cars. The vehicles that are destined for a life outside of PetrolBlog circles. Go straight to jail, do not pass go. No room at the inn, etc, etc.
And the Chrysler PT Cruiser was always going to be the car that provided the springboard for the feature. So what do we think? Is Ian ahead of the curve on this one?
The case for the prosecution would almost certainly put forward the Chrysler Pronto Cruizer as exhibit A. The concept unveiled at the 1998 Geneva Motor Show was far more appealing than the actual production car.
It was finished in a nice shade of ‘Claudia Schiffer yellow’ (a proper 90s colour), while the overall design looked more cohesive and in keeping with the 1930s styling and hot rod vibe. In the case of the Cruizer-Cruiser, three doors is most certainly better than five. A story of what might have been.
Amazingly, the Chrysler PT Cruiser enjoyed a ten-year production life, going on sale in April 2000 and not bowing out until July 2010. By this time, Chrysler had shifted some 1.35 million units, which is a remarkable achievement for such a niche vehicle. In the US at least, the reborn Volkswagen Beetle had nothing on the PT Cruiser.
Part of its appeal was undoubtedly its versatility. The Chrysler PT Cruiser was as much a small van as it was a hatchback, as the rear seats featured integrated carrying handles and could be removed to create a totally flat surface. As an option, the front passenger seat could be folded to create a table or a load length of up to eight-foot. Painters, decorators and window cleaners, this could be the car for you.
The parcel shelf design was clever, too, offering five different positions and the potential to create a picnic table. In fact, the whole interior was pretty cool, with a cue-ball style gear-shifter, deep-cowl dashboard pods and a retro four-spoke steering wheel.
Yes, the interior was plasticky, but it was light, airy and supremely practical. Thanks to its Chrysler Neon origins, it also wasn’t that expensive. Prices started just shy of £13,000, although you’d pay more for special editions and the Cabrio version, but more on this later.
Put it this way, would you rather go to work in a PT Cruiser or a compact MPV? And no, staying at home isn’t an option.
It’s all too easy to be dismissive of the Chrysler PT Cruiser and it could slot neatly into the ‘unlovable’ category. But maybe, just maybe, this dog is about to have its day. That interior is suddenly becoming quite desirable, especially in light of so many other characterless and uninspiring efforts.
And who doesn’t love a cue-ball style gear knob?
The car still needs to go on a journey. Bangerwatch status means it will be bought by people looking for cheap transport, rather than something to cherish. There are also far too many ‘tastefully modified’ examples on the road, which isn’t great for the car’s image. But when the dust settles, the Chrysler PT Cruiser might emerge with some credibility. A car so of its time, yet so retro in its delivery.
There is, however, one massive fly in the ointment. Just when the case for the defence was leading to nods of approval from members of the jury, the prosecution produces its trump card. Step forward, the Chrysler PT Cruiser Cabrio.
Good grief. It’s like peeling back the lid on a tin of spam. And those shiny alloy wheels? No, just no. Like the forthcoming Range Rover Evoque Convertible and Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet, it’s impossible to look good behind the wheel of one of these.
Cabrio version aside, what do we think? Time to embrace the Chrysler PT Cruiser? Snog, marry or avoid? Don’t let the photos of former footballers and ill-fitting suits sway your decision either way.
|cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics||11 months||This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".|
|cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional||11 months||The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".|
|cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary||11 months||This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".|
|cookielawinfo-checkbox-others||11 months||This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.|
|cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance||11 months||This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".|